FRIENDS IN THE MEDIA

Many Americans have come to the conclusion that major newspaper and network and cable television companies have made the decision not to provide any news in some areas and material omissions in most major stories. Even minor stories must be filtered through cultural Marxism’s acceptable phraseology. The media must depend on the gullibility of the grassroots peons of the Democrat-Republican Socialist International for readership and viewership support.
What makes the major media tick? Consider:

“ ‘We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time Magazine and other great (sic) publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years.’ He went on to explain: ‘It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supernational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national autodetermination practiced in past centuries.’ “

*David Rockefeller, speaking at the June 1991 Bilderberger meeting in Baden Baden, Germany [a meeting also attended by then Governor Bill Clinton and Dan Cal], cited by Geoff Metcalf Significant Quote Series: 002

Please note that David Rockefeller is stating his opposition to national democracy, whether the original Republican form of government or the contemporary democratic form, in which money and media publicity shapes the voters. Not surprisingly, his family has worked against the general welfare of the nation since at least the days of John D. Rockefeller. Virtually all the organizations associated with the Rockefellers work against the nation. Whether the Council on Foreign Affairs, the Trilateralists, NAFTA, the United Nations, Planned Parenthood, the Organization of the American States, or the Lucis Trust (formerly Lucifer Publications Company), among many, the concepts advocated strive to establish a supra-national organization or otherwise injure the independence and vitality of the nation.

To give birth to this world government, the Rockefeller family and their entourage have worked with communists, national socialists, anarchists, Jews, Christians and Muslims, newspaper owners, etc, [See Quigley, TRAGEDY AND HOPE]. Nowhere in this lengthy labor have these people had any idea of the value of popular determination of policy. The Rockefeller ideal may not be a one-man dictatorship, but it does perceive a rule by “the best and brightest” that brooks no meaningful input from John Q. Public. It is an oligarchy in form, but there seems to be an implied caste system, which will protect this Rockefeller dream from the “vulgar masses.”

As for the dream of intellectuals working harmoniously with international bankers, I will only comment that “big boys always rule little boys.” No intellectual will be much more than an errand boy. Further, intellectuals have, I believe, been correctly perceived as people who can find a thousand objections to any issue but who can never make the decisive administrative order to do something. Therefore, one can look to the international bankers to turn to their preferred sources of power and order – the world army, the world intelligence apparatus and the world cops.

The Rockefeller family and their brothers in crime “have been lying to themselves,” as they “spa hop” annually about the globe attending their Bilderberger meetings. They like to talk in private and “off the record” because their blowzy ideas, if known, would be punctured by countless armchair critics in short order.

NOTE: Due to ongoing hacking problems, I am unable to achieve uniform font and size for type. It is the tax my censors demand of my comments.