Showing posts with label racism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label racism. Show all posts

Saturday, June 20, 2015

THE CHARGE OF RACISM





The concept of race regularly enters the public domain in one way or another, often by means of the media. If the media features this topic, there is usually a pejorative connotation and a named target violator. America’s social arbiters would prefer that the issue never arose, as they would like to consign it forever to a time in ancient history when such terrible ideas walked the Earth. In the view of such people – and many allied people, the idea of race is a lamentable fossil, which by all rights should finally accept extinction and expire in a tar pit somewhere. “Good riddance!” think they.
However, I not only differ with these powerful, social arbiters but see a positive good in the diversity of races. Vive la difference

Unfortunately for me, by accepting diversity I have enraged the American leadership for which diversity is merely the first part of a two-part program which ends in the creation of Homo blendo, the blended new man for the New World Order. As with the preparation of a puree, one gathers the distinct ingredients together before wedding them into the final desired dish.

Personally, I am the end product of a Norwegian, an English and an Irish genetic series of lines which converged just so I am. I’m not asserting that these genetic lines "plotted" to create me, although I do believe the matter was overseen by Someone watching – from a distance. [Of course, I speak here of the “hand of God.”]

Some might assert that, from my own mouth, I had described myself as a “human blend.” 

My view is the same as most of the great minds of Western Civilization that all of the groups mentioned were kindred people. Hence, their genetic intermingling did not add or subtract from the group nor create a new group.

Strangely, my defense of the right of my people to continue, bearing the same genetic markers they have had for thousands of years, has marked me as a “racist” by the typical adherent to the views of the leading circles in America. My defense of their right to celebrate the cultural highlights and, indeed, norms which their ancestors created has been met by angry snarls and bitter vitriol. What to think!

Please bear in mind that I have painstakingly stated and restated on television that I do not believe that one race is superior to another because such beliefs would be subjective and idiosyncratic. However, there is nothing wrong or abnormal in preferring one’s own. Nor is there anything wrong with one’s group benefiting from a fair share of “the good things of the Earth.” Conversely, such a group is perfectly justified in calling to the attention of other people that an unjust allocation of goods has occurred.

I have always believed that in a democracy, or democratic republic, the views of the majority should be reflected in the policies and laws in operation. Instead, the views of minorities appear to carry more weight. How can this be? Overwhelmingly, visible media personnel reflect not the majority but the minorities. When a member of a nation’s majority does appear on television, it is typically as a female figure or someone featured in a lesser position – such as weatherman. How can this be?

From Mr. Volcker to Ms. Yellen every appointed head of the Federal Reserve has been a Jew. The Federal Reserve System is a private one to which Congress in the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 delegated the authority to create the legal tender money for the United States of America. It is a “money trust” based on fictitious money, usury and certain key “money center” banks. Unlike real government departments and agencies, it has never been audited. In recent time a partial audit occurred due to building pressures by public on Congress.

The Supreme Court has become an interesting national institution, as it presently is majority minorities, being composed of, in part, three Jews, one African American and one Puerto Rican (who may be in part of Jewish extraction). All of these minorities have been noisy in the past as they proclaimed victimization by the majority. In the 1940s or 1950s Jews most likely developed the argument “tyranny of the majority,” which was kicked about by press, politicians and professional scholars.  Incidentally, all the white members of the Supreme Court are Roman Catholic. There are no white Protestants on the Court. The WASPS have lost their sting.

Is their a silent policy of white genocide actively being pursued by the ruling circles of America?

Needless to say, by bruiting about such curiosities on television and Internet, I increasingly aroused the enmity of the Ruling Circles. The terms “racist,” “bigot,” and “prejudiced” were regularly hurled at me by proponents of minority rule and by the anti-white crowd, which included kept whites, who, along with Susan Sontag, a Jewess, viewed white people as the world’s cancer. Intellectuals such as Norman Mailer found this observation to be a brilliant insight.

When people talk like an enemy, I believe that it is fair to assume that they may well be. Many people who denounce me as a “racist” would be startled if someone drew a negative inference about them and would weep bitter tears soon thereafter. 

In America there are a few groups of professionally persecuted people. Jews have been the historic “leader of the pack.” As such, they have organized literally scores – perhaps thousands – of well-funded Jewish associations, foundations and legal defense groups to propagandize in behalf of Jews and to vigorously defend and/or attack undesired criticisms. Jews even established secular spying organizations such as the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith and the Southern Poverty Law Center, the latter of which spends much of its time spying on “extremists groups,” which can be initially identified by their criticism of Jews and then reported to the F.B.I. as a “hate crime” group.

They have also helped organize lobbying and legal defense associations for other minorities such as African Americans and Latinos. In the nineteenth Century abolitionist groups were in the forefront of helping black slaves, and in the early 20th Century descendants of abolitionists helped black descendants of slaves to organize the N.A.A.C.P. Later, Jews in particular were prominent in the N.A.A.C.P. Legal Defense Fund. Jews have been ready helpers in the large number of African American lobbying and propaganda associations, being especially generous in providing funding.

The vast numbers of Latinos that moved into the United States were not laggards in being organized into a plethora of associations and “anti-defamation” type organizations. At the same time that some white citizens were complaining about the massive invasion by various Hispanic groups and were being bashed by intellectuals and politicians, led by Jews, Latinos were organizing La Raza (“The Race”), a blatantly racial organization, before which many prominent, liberal politicians gave speeches.

I remember years ago talking with a few fellows. As the conversation proceeded, one of the men by the name of Perez, who was apparently Latino, said, “I’m a Jew. Lots of people don’t know that.” As a matter of fact, at the time I had not considered that. However, in later historical study I discovered that a portion of the Jews booted out of Spain in approximately 1492 A.D. went to South America, Central America and the Caribbean. In Spain the Sephardic Jews had developed a jargon “Ladino” (sometimes pronounced “Latino”), and they carried this tongue with them. Later, Ashkenazi Jews from East Europe/Russia joined them, bringing their own argot “Yiddish.” No wonder Latinos began to talk of Americans as “gringos.” The New World Latino has become a master of strange patois. More than a few of these Jews made their way to prominence in the South and Central American lands, and some, almost predictably, by means of slavery.

As I was to learn, more than a few of these Latino Jews joined the Great Invasion, and, after amnesty, found themselves rapidly rising across the board in the American scene. 

As all these changes occurred, the feckless WASPs accepted their eclipse gracefully, joining the now-Jewish led alliance of minorities. The white middle class went to schools where text books were carefully selected to undercut and annihilate the beliefs of their fathers. Their children increasingly embraced “sex and drugs and rock-n-roll,” instinctively aware that they had been offered to Moloch by a system created to annihilate them.

After all that, few Americans remained who were unabashedly white and affirmed themselves as a “good thing.” I am one such. Due to the changes which have occurred in my life, I have become “the few.” I recall when the white population in America was about 90%. I will probably live to see America’s white population drop below 50%. However, of the remaining white population very few are “white like me.” They want to be something else, and their descendants will be something else.

Hence, for a white person such as me, there is an inevitability in being denounced as a racist by the various voices of the ruling circles. Real diversity is despised and so are its champions.

Tuesday, February 21, 2012

OFFICE PROTOCOL

Today, I made a delivery to an office in north Arlington (VA). The item happened to be a blue truck with flowers. It wasn't a subpoena or any other legal document. I didn't feel obliged to be grim and terse. In fact I decided to be a bit flippant, composing a fictional origin for the sender of the item I carried.

My destination was a business that styled itself "Imagine Schools" (or some such). I took an elevator to the appropriate floor and entered the office of Imagine Schools.

"Here is a gift from Yoko Ono and the spirit of John Lennon," I announced to the young woman at the front desk. As she looked at me with a deadpan expression, saying nothing, I further ventured, "It is intended for L--- E---. Does that ring any bells?" She replied, "Yes."

I had her sign for the gift as a proof of delivery and left. As I waited for the elevator, I saw her walking from her front desk area, holding the blue truck bearing flowers.

Later, I was to learn that she had emailed the source of the blue truck with flowers to complain that she had suffered a racist remark from the delivery man who, she alleged, called her "Yoko Ono."

I assured the source that that was not the case, accurately repeating the expression I had used to humorously preface my delivery.

I explained to the source that "Imagine" is the title of a song by a famous singer, John Lennon. His wife and soul-mate was Yoko Ono. They had declared that they were two bodies with one soul. They were really tight.

Hence, I thought that a business that styled itself "Imagine Schools" might find some humor in my referencing Yoko Ono and the spirit of John Lennon (he's deceased now). For all I knew, the business title may have been a homage to Lennon's famous song. No way Jose! (Oooopps!)

The woman manning the front desk was deeply offended and down right pissed. Hence, her email to my business associate who was the source of the gift.

Incidentally, guess what this woman's last name was? Sing! I kid you not.

Thursday, July 14, 2011

ARLINGTON COUNTY DETENTION BLUES

About two years ago, I had reason to go to the Arlington County Courthouse building at 1425 North Courthouse Road in Virginia. As I was walking to the entrance which is at the side facing a small open court area, I could hear the repeated cry of some male high above in the twin building across the court. This twin building holds the county detention facilities.

The voice kept crying out the single word "No!" The tone of the voice was a blend connoting horror, disbelief, loss, pain and humiliation. It was quite loud. It continued all the way to the courthouse, where I went through security. I said nothing then or later. This is my first reflection on the matter.

The voice of the man was in my view undoubtedly that of a white male. His reason for crying out I immediately surmised. He had been "piped," that is to say that he was the victim of a prison rape. He was sodomized involuntarily.

Further, given the inmate population at Arlington County Detention, the probability was very high that he was sexually attacked by black inmates. There also may have been Latino participation.

The treatment of this issue in the media - especially if it's blended with entertainment - is to treat the matter as some sort of humorous matter. There may be a "Glad it's not me!" quality blended into it, and, if so, it is the closest that typical media types come to condemning a major crime. Further, there tends to be in these coverages an assumption that the rapist(s) are indicating their commendable masculinity at the expense of a "whimp." Given the dynamics of these matters, black inmates are the beneficiaries of these sorts of "spin" put on such events. In part this is no doubt a bi-product of homophilia in Arlington County and "official" America (i.e. leaders in politics and the academic-intellectual-creative complex). This is too bad, as they are entirely unworthy human specimens.

Why do some black inmates sexually attack white and other inmates? One easy answer is "the triumph of evil in our prison system." If evil is triumphant, then it must be championed by the authorities that run prisons. In this instance the people who "control" Arlington County Detention.

There can be no hypocrisy greater than sentencing a man to imprisonment for committing a crime and then incarcerating him in an institution which nurtures criminal behavior. Prating about "rehabilitation" of inmates is an absurdity where criminal behavior among inmates has a sort of state-sponsorship.

Who are the dominant forces in American politics and in the academic-intellectual-creative complex? The answer would be Jews, Freemasons, Roman Catholic leaders and business. There is overlap among these. These are also the forces behind homophilia generally. In the case of the Roman Catholic Church the record among its male clergy is so bad that the condemnation of homosexual activity invites derision. Hence, the ill influence of the Roman Catholic Church is more a matter of non-leadership in the area of moral behavior.

As Jews have produced numerous rabbis who have learnedly spoken in favor of pederasty, if the boy is less than nine years of age, informed individuals would not look for Biblical standards to dominate in this group. A brief reflection upon the movie and television dominance of Jews would confirm their liberal - not to mention pornographic - interests in sexuality. The wise individual would look elsewhere for moral leadership.

As for Freemasonry, it is closely linked to Jewry. Freemasonry "speaks" in symbols, and its symbols are Jewish and occult. Both Jews and Freemasons share an interest in the Cabalah as a fundamental source of knowledge, and it is the Jewish Cabalah they ponder. One of the premier goals of Freemasonry is to help Jews rebuild the Temple in Jerusalem. For Freemasons the "Temple" has two meanings: one, a literal construction, and two, a symbolic construction (individual human "makeover"). The latter is connected to the Cabalah, to evolution, and to "perfecting" oneself.

For both occult Jews and Freemasons (the latter includes a relatively high percentage of Protestant clergy) creation from the nothingness of god to the final vulgar world included the crucial Adam Cadmus stage. This is the stage at which the male and female principles are united, prior to their bifurcation into "Adam and Eve." For both occult Jews and Freemasons homosexuality reflects that higher state when male and female principles were one. Therefore, while not equating the Adam Cadmus stage with the homosexuality of the lower material world, they see a "reflection" between them that mandates respect from them.

The ordinary world rarely perceives the religious character of concepts operating in polity that originate and are "sanctified" by the devotees of the occult mystery religions. Yet, all law flows from religious beliefs.

In America there is no separation of church and state. Biblically-based Christianity has been displaced by the concepts that spring from the Jewish Cabalah. The latter provides the inspiration for contemporary law-making. Hence, the posture of authorities toward homosexual rape and sodomy in the Arlington County Detention Center takes on the character of sponsorship, much as new laws regarding marriage, adoption, employment, and medical-pension-assisted living provisions of civil law reflect the new religion.

No prison institution can eradicate consenual homosexual relations between inmates. They can discourage it, however. Nor can any prison institution completely eradicate prison rape. However, in the latter case the offending inmates can be punished. If this is a capital crime on the "outside," it should be on the inside of prisons. I believe that such inmates should be put to death. The alternate would be to isolate such inmates on a 24/7 basis in a "no-frills" institution which costs the nation the least possible money consistant with health standards.

In prison the rights of citizens are abridged. The right to privacy is one such abridgement. Therefore, all prisons/detention facilities could be equipped with an array of cameras that precluded any criminal act going unnoticed (at least by the videomaking cameras). These videos could be automatically stored each day to preclude their "being lost." Were a video "lost," the top officials at the facility and with the company that operated the video-storage facility could receive mandatory five year sentences for evidence tampering. If a politician(s) ordered up the video and destroyed it, he/they would automatically receive twenty year sentences with no possibilty of "presidential pardon." In short it is possible to discourage "authorities" from destroying evidence.

Now, returning to the hapless man that I heard loudly shouting his lament. When I left the courthouse area, he was still at it. Absolutely no one seemed concerned among the "authorities" visible on the outside and surely aware of it on the inside. Odds were good that some "jokes" were bandied about by them. That is the way of modern America.

As it happened, only a few days later, I was again sent to the Arlington County Courthouse. As I was going toward the entrance, I could hear some discussion of me. The voices were mostly those of black males. The Detention Center holding cells in part overlook the court that separates the Detention Center from the Courthouse. However, one of the voices was that of a white man. The black males were making sexually-charged comments. The white voice asked "why the comments," or something of the sort. There was some sort of garbled reply from one or more black inmates. The white man then replied, "You really did a number on me."

At that point I realized that that man was the same that had been shouting his lament a few days prior. It further dawned on me how racist the prison system was - not based on white attitudes but on black behavior. With the laissez-faire policy of the Arlington County officials, consistent with the new laws of America based on its new religion, I saw that racism was already institutionalized here.