WAR AND WARRIORS

I've noticed that with the relentless waging of war by America has come a growing trend to make of our wars "holy wars" and of our fallen soldiers "hero saints" whose spilt blood sanctifies the fields on which it flowed. In my mind this borders on idolatry and is false.

American leaders have now made wars to impose democracy as Biblically correct. It is The Most High's desire. To impose democracy and freedom upon all the people of the world is a sacred duty consistent with the obligation to "repair the world." It amounts to bringing the blessings of Heaven upon Earth.

My understanding of Heaven is that it isn't a democracy. Of course, what do I know?

The elite leadership of America believes in "repairing the world." The Pentagon is gung-ho to annihilate the impaired shards of creation so that the world will become progressively "better."

Since Christianity is itself an impaired shard from the point of view of these elite thinkers, you will excuse this Christian's "count me out" attitude. Perhaps that was the wrong terminology to use, given the annihilation scenario.

Focusing once more on my primary thrust in this blog, I must say that the U.S. fighting men have never been saintly. In fact they are sometimes barbarous. They may look spiffy in new and/or clean dress uniforms, but when the life and death moments arrive, they must act like savage beasts - not saints. The media would have interested Americans believe that we are sending out our best and brightest versions of Saint Francis of Assisi. Therefore, their loss is ever more painful and their blood - if not holy - is at least saintly. The image isn't accurate. The non-American world press is more likely to "tell it like it is."

To learn more about the truth of soldiers perhaps we should turn to examples of the opinions of the West's greatest soldiers that are separated by a significant period of time. Consider the famed Duke of Wellington who led England's forces against Napoleon and others.

"He took a low view of the moral character of his armies. At various times he found his forces as a whole 'infamous,' 'a rabble.' The men were 'the scum of the earth,' a phrase he repeated many times. 'None but the worst description of men enter the regular service.' Or again: 'People talk of their enlisting from their fine military feeling - all stuff - no such thing. Some of our men enlist from having got bastard children - some for minor offences - many more for drink.' The non-commissioned officers were the only group to escape criticism, and even they got disgustingly drunk on the night of a victory. The officers were brave, but could not be got to pay 'minute and constant attention to orders.' The commissariat was 'very bad indeed.' The cavalry were useless: They charged head on, then 'gallop back as fast as they gallop on the enemy'; they 'never think of maneuvring,' indeed cannot maneuver, 'except on Wimbledon Common.' The generals 'make me tremble.' The infantry, when properly trained, were all right, but even they had to be 'ruled with a rod of iron.' On the other hand, no one grudged spending his armies more than did the Duke. He wept bitterly when his officers were killed and valued the lives of his soldiers more than did any other contemporary commander, attributing his compassion to the British constitution...." [Paul Johnson, THE BIRTH OF THE MODERN, page 65]

As during the days of Wellington, many American generals and admirals rose to their positions due to political assistance. Being connected to influential people was and is the fastest route. Given the reality of ultimate power in this country (excluding the sword itself), there can be no surprise that their work tends to support, expand and enrich our Levantine "friends." Be that as it may, let us fast forward to hear from America's most decorated Marine General, Smedley D. Butler.

"War is a racket. It always has been. It is possibly the oldest, easily the most profitable, surely the most vicious. It is the only one international in scope. It is the only one in which the profits are reckoned in dollars and the losses in lives.

"A racket is best described, I believe, as something that is not what it seems to the majority of the people. Only a small 'inside' group knows what it is about. It is conducted for the benefit of the very few, at the expense of the very many. Out of war a few people make huge fortunes.

"In the World War [I] a mere handful garnered the profits of the conflict. At least 21,000 new millionaires and billionaires were made in the United States during the World War. That many admitted their huge blood gains in their income tax returns. How many other war millionaires falsified their tax returns no one knows."

Parenthetically, Eugene Meyer, the grandfather of Donald Graham, CEO of the Washington Post Company, was accused of duplicating U.S. Treasury bonds ("one for Uncle Sam, one for me, one for Uncle Sam, one for me," etc). He was brought before Congress to explain the apparent duplications. He denied involvement, but was suspected ever after of being a great thief, getting away with about 100 million dollars. Bernard Baruch, who worked with Eugene Meyer at one of the special war offices, was said to have entered service with the Wilson Administration possessing a net worth of some 18 million dollars and exiting with over 200 million dollars.

As General Butler stated, war is profitable for a few well-placed and connected speculators. But let's hear more from the General Smedley Butler's article.

"Out of war nations acquire additional territory, if they are victorious. They just take it. This newly acquired territory promptly is exploited by the few - the selfsame few who wrung dollars out of blood in the war. The general public shoulders the bill.

"And what is this bill?

"This bill renders a horrible accounting. Newly placed gravestones. Mangled bodies. Shattered minds. Broken hearts and homes. Economic instability. Depression and all its attendant miseries. Back-breaking taxation for generations and generations.

"For a great many years, as a soldier, I had a suspicion that war was a racket; not until I retired to civil life did I fully realize it. Now that I see the international war clouds gathering, as they are today, I must face it and speak out....

"Yes, all over, nations are camping in their arms. The mad dogs of Europe are on the loose. In the Orient the maneuvering is more adroit. Back in 1904, when Russia and Japan fought, we kicked out our old friends the Russians and backed Japan. Then our very generous international bankers were financing Japan. Now the trend is to poison us against the Japanese....

"Boys with a normal viewpoint were taken out of the fields and offices and factories and classrooms and put into the ranks. There they were remolded; they were made over; they were made to 'about face'; to regard murder as the order of the day. They were put shoulder to shoulder and, through mass psychology, they were entirely changed. We used them for a couple of years and trained them to think nothing at all of killing or of being killed....

"Napoleon once said: 'All men are enamored of decorations...they positively hunger for them.'

"So by developing the Napoleonic system - the medal business - the government learned it could get soldiers for less money, because the boys liked to be decorated. Until the Civil War there were no medals. Then the Congressional Medal of Honor was handed out. It made enlistment easier. After the Civil War no new medals were issued until the Spanish-American War.

"Thus, having stuffed patriotism down their throats, it was decided to make them help pay for the war, too. So, we gave them the large salary of $30 a month....Half of that wage (just a little more than a riveter in a shipyard or a laborer in a munitions factory safe at home made in a day) was promptly taken from him to support his dependents, so that they would not become a charge upon his community. Then we made him pay what amounted to accident insurance - something the employer pays for in an enlightened state - and that cost him $6 a month. He had less than $9 a month left.

"Then, the most crowning insolence of all - he was virtually blackjacked into paying for his own ammunition, clothing, and food by being made to buy Liberty Bonds. Most soldiers got no money at all on pay days.

"We made them buy Liberty Bonds at $100 and then we bought them back - when they came back from the war and couldn't find work - at $84 and $86. And the soldiers bought about $2,000,000,000 worth of these bonds!...

"Well, it's a racket, all right." [from Smedley Butler, 1933 article "War Is A Racket" reprinted by The Barnes Review, July/August 2003 issue, pages 33-39]

I don't think that the military-industrial-banker complex has changed much since General Butler put his knowledge and experience to print in protest against their racket. The enlisted men are overly praised and criminally underpaid. The generals and admirals agree to do the "break-leg" work for the banking loan-sharks, which is first filtered through congress to make it all official. The few get incredibly richer with each war, and the people burdened with accruing and crushing debt.

THE LONG FORM

I was driving and listening to the radio, when the news reported that President Barack Obama had unexpectedly produced a "long-form" of his birth certificate. The man who announced the news indicated - or someone he was interviewing indicated - that it had an old style of typed or stamped number with the individual numbers not well aligned. These news reporters were clearly suggesting that the misaligned numbers in faded ink were proof positive of its authenticity.

However, due to the leading nature of this aspect of the suddenly appearing Barack Obama long-form and the "who-can-doubt-its-authenticity" conclusion, I was immediately suspicious. This particular radio station is a Mormon-owned, Washington Post-perspective medium. Hence, "spin-doctoring" and material-omission surgery are commonplace acts of reportage and analysis.

However, a more reliable source of information, American Free Press, provided an important caveat on this matter in its May 9 & 16, 2011 issue, page 2. This is probably the only news and opinion outlet in operation that is attacked by hackers almost as much as my Internet sites.

Please consider:

"The latest Certificate of Live Birth (COLB) that Barack Obama issued in late April, which the mainstream hails as the final proof of his birth in Honolulu, is not a real birth certificate at all and is but a poor imitation of an authentic COLB. Computer imagery experts have already shown that the letters and numbers were digitally manipulated and superimposed onto an recreation of green document paper using a modern computer - meaning that in these experts' view, the latest COLB is not an authentic photocopy of an original 1961 record filled out with a 1960s manual typewriter."

Anyone familiar with the work of German Udo Walendy is probably familiar with the numerous forged and faked photographs of alleged Nazi atrocities utilized to murder and imprison German officials and military officers at the Nuremberg trials, as well as to add "authority" to numerous sensational "history" books appearing on the scene thereafter. These frauds were perpetrated by Jews and their agents to further their agendas. Almost all books utilizing these "pictures" were authored by Jews. (Last I heard, Mr. Walendy was serving a five year sentence in a German jail for hurting Jewish feelings by detailing their fraud, which is forbidden in Germany.)

Considering the Walendy examples of sloppy "picture" creations, I cannot help but to wonder if the Barack Obama long-form was a "Tel Aviv Special," as counterfeit and fraudulent items seem to be an Israeli specialty. Let's hope that members of the Birthers Movement don't suffer the same fate as Mr. Walendy.

Although African Americans and Democrats overwhelmingly support the president and would do so even if he were from Outer Space ("The Brother From Another Planet") and transformed before them from "good old Dudick" into a dragon-like critter, other Americans may insist on an American president being American (and human).

With this president the problems don't seem to stop. American Free Press also printed another aspect of the Barack Obama affair. Consider:

"Article 2, section 1, clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution says the president must be a 'natural born Citizen.' Many people erroneously think that means merely native-born, but Ohio Rep. John Bingham's definition of the term in 1866 on the House floor remains unchallenged: 'Every human being born within the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural born citizen.' That is taken to mean both parents. Every president from George Washington on has qualified under that definition except for Obama, whose supposed father was a Kenyan native and a British subject."

> American Free Press, supra

In a largely corrupt America most people will wonder, "What's the dif?" Tattoos are important - not constitutional qualifications. Incidentally, tattoos are the emblems of an outlaw lifestyle.

It seems certain that Barack Obama was never constitutionally qualified to be president of the United States of America. That he was selected by the Democrat Party speaks volumes about that party. His seemingly "special effects" historical journey to the White House indicates that powerful interests in and beyond America want him to be the president. Remember his embarrassing Nobel Prize issued on visions of his future deeds? Who was behind that?

Well, what is to be done? In my view it is best to drop the matter of his birth and qualifications because if he were proven to be ineligible, then his four years in office would be "null and void." All that was done by him and congress during his years at the White House would be voided. It would create such a mess that avoiding that is more important than debating the issue further. However, it should be the highest priority to make certain that Barack Obama serves only one term, and that no one else ever "pulls a fast one" in regard to basic qualifications again.

From the point of view of those who have pushed Barack Obama onto the presidential campaign road, the fatal wounding of the U.S. Constitution may be the primary objective.

REDSKINS

I have been meaning to make a comment about the Redskin quarterback, Donavan McNabb, for some time. He was an exciting quarterback to watch. He threw the long ball a lot. He scrambled for dear life. His team won or lost about the same number of times. If his receivers were more skillful, his completion record would have been very respectable.

Donavan McNabb looked rather like Sonny Jurgenson, whose tenure at DC was mostly as an air-ball loser. Washington fans loved Sonny. This never was the case with McNabb.

Parenthetically, I expect that Dan Snyder will soon rename the Washington Redskins the "Washington Reds." If the team ever developed a great "front four," it could be dubbed "the Red Menace." With Mr. Leonsis' approval, the Reds' fans could "rock the Reds."

My personal favorite, as a team name, is "The Washington Redskinks." That way, the team fight song would still work:
                "Hail to the Redskinks! Reptiles on the move! Cold-blooded critters, fight for old DC."

WASHINGTON REDSKINS

I've varied from my norm this year, taking time to watch a few Redskin football games. What with people getting run over or otherwise injured, I've seen the ambulance-chasing profession prosper greatly over the last few years. I've made my share of loot from the carnage. Along with the tattoo business, ambulance-chasing has seen a sharp spike in business.

Therefore, I don't feel embarrassed to state that I've idled away a few hours watching football on the tube. How about them 'skins?

Some years ago (not too many, either), there was a lively debate about whether the Redskins professional football team should change its name. Certain Indian tribal peoples sued them, as I recall. The argument seemed to be that the name was "racist." Indian proponents of change pointed out that no team would name itself with terms such as Kikes, Honkeys, Slopes, Towelheads, Wops, or Rugheads.

Unfortunately for the Indian lawsuit, the judges involved in the case were not "agents of change."

Now it should be noted that the term "Redskin" arose among early American settlers on the Atlantic seaboard because the predominant tribe(s) encountered daubed red clay (or the like) on their skin. Whether this coating was meant to be a protective coating from stinging bugs, as with elephants and other insect-afflicted beasts, I cannot say. Perhaps, as with modern women, this coating was thought a beauty-enhancing addition. Also, there may have been a desire to appear fierce, dignified, or peaceful. Hard to say right off.

That tidbit of info was just thrown in due to my living in Virginia, and we are all so concerned about education. I keep lecturing the youngsters, "Don't use crystal meth!" Also, I tell them, "Don't jaywalk like the DC people do (especially when drunk)."

The point of this blog is that I have a name-change for the Washington Redskins. I propose that the new name for the team be "Washington Skin-Of-The-Teethskins." 

CYBER-DELINQUENTS

Thanks to the invincible chutzpah of American Jews, an "Untouchables" category of Jewish intruders into personal computers has taken place. Juvenile Jews appear to be drafted into one or more of the many Jewish domestic spying operations, operated by the Anti-Defamation League of B'Nai B'rith, the Southern Poverty Law Center, and the like. They are assigned an enemies list. Provided training and technical equipment, they invade and control a personal computer before its owner's eyes.

Some readers may recall the massive dossiers accumulated illegally by the ADL in the San Francisco area. There were more than twelve thousand in that one city. It created an instant uproar, but, as with virtually any crime of this type committed by organized Jewish groups, the issue just seems to "go away." It is true that most of the great spying operations in America were run by Jews, and some of these Jews have been imprisoned. The U.S. Navy spy, Pollard, is a case in point. However, he is a hero to the Israelis, and American zionists, including the "Christian" variety, will probably have him released soon. Look to President Obama giving him a Presidential pardon before leaving office.

It is true that most of the large blogging sites that provide an opportunity to express views over the internet are controlled by Jews. That is true for Google, FaceBook, WordPress, and many another. All these sites operate as intelligence-gathering companies. The whole business of the theft of Inslaw Inc.'s Promis software improvements that allowed for "back-door" spying and which improvements were not part of the contract between Inslaw Inc. and the Department of Justice about 20 years ago by the Justice Department was as much an Israeli theft as a Justice Department theft. Earl Brian, a businessman and friend of both Ronald Reagan and Ed Meese, managed to get the stolen improvements and made a sales pitch in Tel-Aviv. Apparently both the U.S.A. and Israel were involved in selling the product to 88 or so countries. It was allegedly "tweaked" to allow spying on the countries that bought it.

In 1987 Bankruptcy Judge George Bason termed the Department of Justice's behavior in regard to the stolen Promis software as "trickery, fraud, and deceit" and as "contempt for both the law and any principle of fair dealings." These are not exactly ther sort of terms one would expect to be used about the Department of Justice.

While spying on you is a rather common procedure, neither Jews nor the federal government cotton to free speech that spotlights them in a negative way. In fact they want to outlaw such criticism. Whether they term it "hate" or "terror," fact, law and truth are hated by them and feared with profound terror. Aren't they "socially conscious?" Why would anyone criticize them? Such people must hate! Presently, all Fedcops are extremely concerned about "home-grown" terror. However, the scope of their fear does not include Jewish cyber-delinquent terrorists.

If breaking-and-entering of a house is a felony, why isn't breaking-and-entering a personal computer a felony? Why shouldn't I be able to go to the police, ask for the department of cyber-breakins, state a complaint, allow the police to "stake-out" my computer, and catch the cyber-delinquents "red-handed?" The reason is probably because that would annihilate a whole generation of Jews who are needed to guide America into the New World Order. Most likely, Jews would liken such an event to a holocaust of the computer-literate Jews. Hence, Congress and the courts would never approve.

WordPress "suspended" my blogsite ("Nomoonnight") and annihilated over 100 pithy blogs. They did not and would not explain why. They merely cited their "rules." If ninety-nine blogs were published, did the one hundreth run afoul of their rules? WordPress, as with all Jewish operations, has the chutzpah to do whatever it wishes. Among the non-Jewish leaders in America, none of the men have the "man" to criticize Jewish destructiveness. Most are willing supporters of offenses against reason. It pays off well enough for them.

Throughout the summer I have seen "unknown forces" take control of my computer and set off a wild opening and closing of windows. They control my cursor. It is clear to me that they do this as a sort of temporary employment and as a labor of love. Love? Due to my frequent citation of Jews in unflattering ways, Jews take a special pleasure out of demonstrating their power over my personal computer. There is an inescapable implication that this could be done to my life outside the cyberworld. It is a form of intimidation. It is a variety of terrorism

Not to worry! Menachem Begin stated that Jews "invented terrorism." More than a few Russian tsars and nobles could attest to that gift for violence. But don't expect that Homeland Security would acknowledge the obvious: If Jewish terrorism in America isn't ended, any fight against terrorism is futile.

KISS OF DEATH

The election for the Democrat candidate for mayor of the District of Columbia ("DC") is over. The current mayor was not selected to be the Democrat candidate for the Fall election. In DC the Democrat candidate is considered a "lead-pipe cinch" to be mayor after the election vote is ended. That Democrat candidate will be the invincible Vince Gray.

For the time being The People will have to endure the present mayor, Adrian Fenty. Will he be seen bicycling about with a platoon of Metropolitan police clearing a path for "His Honor?" Most likely, Mayor Fenty will plan a few trips to fabulous locations, observing and offering advice on how to ease from an automobile culture to a bike culture. (Can surries with fringe on the top be far away, Fenty-observers wonder.)  

Needless to say, Adrian Fenty was supported by The Washington Post. The Post as an institution has taken a Neo-Feudalism position for years. The rich ("Lords") and their entourage of advisers should rule a peasantry made fit by hard work and restricted, healthy diets. The rich would see that the poor had a subsistence living, and the poor peasants would send their children to fight the enemies of the rich - typically people not yet willing to give it up to the Lords.

The Washington Post, as well as the great media empires, see a progressive, even evolutionary, society as the fruit of their illuminated vision. The Lords, such as Donald Graham, will demonstrate noblesse oblige toward the teeming masses yearning to be flimflammed.

But hold on! Adrian Fenty was the choice of The Washington Post. And Adrian Fenty lost. How can this be? Has the dream of the rich been betrayed?

Savants of the people have noted that The Washington Post also supported Creigh Deeds for governor in the last Virginia election. What gives? It is true that there were rumors that Donald Graham and Catharine Weymouth thought "Creigh" was "Cree." The implication was that The Washington Post supported him because its leaders thought they were supporting a Native American.

Whatever was the case in the Virginia race, the support of the Democrat by The Washington Post proved to be useless. Now, after the people rose up in DC to cast out Adrian Fenty, also loudly supported by Donald, Catharine & company at the Post, there also arose the thought: Endorsement by The Washington Post is like a "Kiss of Death."

L'AMOUR ARGENTINOISE

As is often the case in the Washington, D.C. area, when driving, I find myself listening to my preferred traffic station on the radio. It is a station that tosses in weather reports, sports news, local & world news, interviews and commentaries between traffic updates. The people one encounters on it can be amusing. One such is "Dave," who is a commentator.

He had gone to theatrical lengths to build up the "macho" image of Richard "Dick" Cheney to make the point that if such a "real he-man" saw nothing objectionable about homosexuals openly "being homosexual" in the U.S. Army, how could mere mortals object.

I had offered a modest correction to this sham by noting that Cheney's daughter was a Lesbian presently enjoying connubial bliss with her bride-partner and that Cheney's wife was alleged to be an author of "hot Lesbian pulp novels." She allegedly used a nom de plume. My point was that "Dave's" peon to the manly Cheney might be overstated. Perhaps Mr. Cheney has a Village People's standard of manliness. Give him a rifle for a prop, and he's ready for the stage.  Mere mortals might even be more macho than the former Veep.

Comes now again old "Dave" to comment theatrically about the decision of Argentina to make "same-sex" marriages legal and fully equal to those of "opposite-sex" marriages. "Dave" carefully built the image of the fiery Latin lover, who was the incarnation of heterosexual love, for the listener to consider. He mentioned the Tango, while sensuous Latin music played in the background. As an aside, he marvelled at this legal decision being accepted in a Roman Catholic country. Doesn't "Dave" know that priests' lead and the faithful follow?  

Generally speaking, "Dave" seemed to be saying that the "Dark Ages" of heterosexual love and marriage were finally evolving into a warm, tolerant "All Love" environment. After all, weren't sodomy and fistf--king just another kind of love?  If that's good enough for the U.S. Army, Dick Cheney and Argentina, why would anyone object?

I have pointed out in blogs - not necessarily this one - that, if same-sex marriages were given legal status, such "married" couples would certainly adopt children. Since they do not normally reproduce according to natural procedures, their best course for continuation and even population growth reside in persuasion and abuse of innocent children placed in their care. In the latter case the abuse would begin in the mind of a child through "broadening," through a coercive "understanding" and through "lessons" in tolerance.

Incidentally, political power usually is a function of wealth, military power or effective block-voting. Numbers can mean clout. 

As the Masonic culture in America demands that all travel the four roads to harmony - Liberty, Fraternity, Equality and Tolerance, "same-sex" couples, whether married or not, should find the law bulldozing away all opposition. There will certainly not be any from the Masonically infiltrated, "shell-christian" congregations, who despise discrimination as breaking the Law of Equality. Whether Roman Catholic priest or Protestant minister, the sermon is the same: "Get down and get it on!"

Incidentally, Admiral Mullen stated that the entirety of his military service included service with homosexuals. I don't believe that he ever explained exactly how he knew that they were homosexuals. Did they know that he was a heterosexual? Does he know?

I guess that it is inevitable that American soldiers will be bringing home a whole new category of "war brides."