I was driving and listening to the radio, when the news reported that President Barack Obama had unexpectedly produced a "long-form" of his birth certificate. The man who announced the news indicated - or someone he was interviewing indicated - that it had an old style of typed or stamped number with the individual numbers not well aligned. These news reporters were clearly suggesting that the misaligned numbers in faded ink were proof positive of its authenticity.
However, due to the leading nature of this aspect of the suddenly appearing Barack Obama long-form and the "who-can-doubt-its-authenticity" conclusion, I was immediately suspicious. This particular radio station is a Mormon-owned, Washington Post-perspective medium. Hence, "spin-doctoring" and material-omission surgery are commonplace acts of reportage and analysis.
However, a more reliable source of information, American Free Press, provided an important caveat on this matter in its May 9 & 16, 2011 issue, page 2. This is probably the only news and opinion outlet in operation that is attacked by hackers almost as much as my Internet sites.
Please consider:
"The latest Certificate of Live Birth (COLB) that Barack Obama issued in late April, which the mainstream hails as the final proof of his birth in Honolulu, is not a real birth certificate at all and is but a poor imitation of an authentic COLB. Computer imagery experts have already shown that the letters and numbers were digitally manipulated and superimposed onto an recreation of green document paper using a modern computer - meaning that in these experts' view, the latest COLB is not an authentic photocopy of an original 1961 record filled out with a 1960s manual typewriter."
Anyone familiar with the work of German Udo Walendy is probably familiar with the numerous forged and faked photographs of alleged Nazi atrocities utilized to murder and imprison German officials and military officers at the Nuremberg trials, as well as to add "authority" to numerous sensational "history" books appearing on the scene thereafter. These frauds were perpetrated by Jews and their agents to further their agendas. Almost all books utilizing these "pictures" were authored by Jews. (Last I heard, Mr. Walendy was serving a five year sentence in a German jail for hurting Jewish feelings by detailing their fraud, which is forbidden in Germany.)
Considering the Walendy examples of sloppy "picture" creations, I cannot help but to wonder if the Barack Obama long-form was a "Tel Aviv Special," as counterfeit and fraudulent items seem to be an Israeli specialty. Let's hope that members of the Birthers Movement don't suffer the same fate as Mr. Walendy.
Although African Americans and Democrats overwhelmingly support the president and would do so even if he were from Outer Space ("The Brother From Another Planet") and transformed before them from "good old Dudick" into a dragon-like critter, other Americans may insist on an American president being American (and human).
With this president the problems don't seem to stop. American Free Press also printed another aspect of the Barack Obama affair. Consider:
"Article 2, section 1, clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution says the president must be a 'natural born Citizen.' Many people erroneously think that means merely native-born, but Ohio Rep. John Bingham's definition of the term in 1866 on the House floor remains unchallenged: 'Every human being born within the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural born citizen.' That is taken to mean both parents. Every president from George Washington on has qualified under that definition except for Obama, whose supposed father was a Kenyan native and a British subject."
> American Free Press, supra
In a largely corrupt America most people will wonder, "What's the dif?" Tattoos are important - not constitutional qualifications. Incidentally, tattoos are the emblems of an outlaw lifestyle.
It seems certain that Barack Obama was never constitutionally qualified to be president of the United States of America. That he was selected by the Democrat Party speaks volumes about that party. His seemingly "special effects" historical journey to the White House indicates that powerful interests in and beyond America want him to be the president. Remember his embarrassing Nobel Prize issued on visions of his future deeds? Who was behind that?
Well, what is to be done? In my view it is best to drop the matter of his birth and qualifications because if he were proven to be ineligible, then his four years in office would be "null and void." All that was done by him and congress during his years at the White House would be voided. It would create such a mess that avoiding that is more important than debating the issue further. However, it should be the highest priority to make certain that Barack Obama serves only one term, and that no one else ever "pulls a fast one" in regard to basic qualifications again.
From the point of view of those who have pushed Barack Obama onto the presidential campaign road, the fatal wounding of the U.S. Constitution may be the primary objective.
